Ideation training benefits transfer by domain: verbal training raised verbal and figural creativity, figural training only figural¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Verbal ideation training produced significant increases in both verbal and figural creativity, while figural training improved only figural tasks. → Gu 2026
Evidence¶
Gu 2026¶
Gu, X., Ritter, S. M., Frossard, F., van den Boom, L., Delfmann, L. R. & Barajas, M. (2026). Fostering creativity in formal schooling: A systematic review of explicit and implicit interventions for young learners. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100784
q2 · i? · review · r2
Narrative review of Fink et al. (2020), a comparison of verbal and figural ideation training in primary school students. The review reports the asymmetric transfer pattern: 'verbal training led to significant increases in both verbal and figural creativity', while figural training improved only the figural task. No effect sizes are printed.
"Their study revealed that verbal training led to significant increases in both verbal and figural creativity, but figural training only led to improvements in a figural task."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Explicit creativity training programs are effective in fostering creativity in formal schooling — a broader claim this one bears on
- Ideation-based interventions are a robustly implemented explicit approach that improves creative performance — a broader claim this one bears on
- Concrete reward increases children's mean ideational fluency on creativity tasks relative to control conditions — related
- Rewarding only 'good' ideas in a final task produced no incentive effect, but this condition was confounded and excluded from the main analysis — related
- Reward effects hold across individual creativity tasks, with immediate reward significant on all four tasks and delayed reward on three — related
- The spatial curriculum produced near transfer to improved spatial scanning and increased self-reported spatial habits of mind, but not to mental rotation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ideation-training-domain-specific-transfer |
title |
Ideation training benefits transfer by domain: verbal training raised verbal and figural creativity, figural training only figural |
description |
Ideation training benefits transfer by domain: verbal training raised verbal and figural creativity, figural training only figural |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gu-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.