Both publication year and journal five-year impact factor statistically significantly predict adherence to intensive longitudinal reporting guidelines¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Publication year significantly predicted guideline adherence (R² = 0.08, F(1, 256) = 23.32, p <.001). → Carina Schreiber & Michael Becker 2026
q2 i? Journal five-year impact factor significantly predicted guideline adherence (R² = 0.05, F(1, 256) = 12.0, p <.001). → Carina Schreiber & Michael Becker 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Carina Schreiber & Michael Becker 2026¶
Carina Schreiber & Michael Becker. (2026). Intensive Longitudinal Methods in School Research: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10203-x
q2 · i? · review · r?
Linear regression on the adherence score (mean of met/not-met guideline ratings) for the 257 included articles: "publication year ( R² = 0.08, F(1, 256) = 23.32, p <.001)" significantly predicted adherence, indicating improving reporting practices over time.
"both publication year ( R² = 0.08, F(1, 256) = 23.32, p <.001) and journal impact factor (R² = 0.05, F(1, 256) = 12.0, p <.001) statistically significantly predicted articles’ adherence to the reporting guidelines."
Carina Schreiber & Michael Becker 2026 (2)¶
Carina Schreiber & Michael Becker. (2026). Intensive Longitudinal Methods in School Research: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10203-x
q2 · i? · review · r3
Same regression analysis: "journal impact factor (R² = 0.05, F(1, 256) = 12.0, p <.001)" significantly predicted adherence, indicating greater transparency in higher-impact journals; the review notes adherence remained questionably low even for recent articles.
"both publication year ( R² = 0.08, F(1, 256) = 23.32, p <.001) and journal impact factor (R² = 0.05, F(1, 256) = 12.0, p <.001) statistically significantly predicted articles’ adherence to the reporting guidelines."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- School-research articles rarely justify their samples, sample sizes, or sampling designs when reporting intensive longitudinal studies — related
- Formal learning context is a significant positive predictor of whether a robotics study reports quantifiable learning gains — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ilm-year-impact-factor-predict-adherence |
title |
Both publication year and journal five-year impact factor statistically significantly predict adherence to intensive longitudinal reporting guidelines |
description |
Both publication year and journal five-year impact factor statistically significantly predict adherence to intensive longitudinal reporting guidelines |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — carina-schreiber-michael-becker-2026, carina-schreiber-michael-becker-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.