Students in the image condition gave higher draw judgment magnitude than text-only students in Study 1a¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 In Study 1a, draw judgment magnitude was significantly higher in the text-with-image condition (d = 0.32). → Jaeger 2024
Evidence¶
Jaeger 2024¶
Jaeger, A. J., & Fiorella, L. (2024). Metacognitive effects of instructional visuals: the role of cue use and judgment type. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09370-x
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Study 1a online experiment with 163 undergraduates reading biology texts. Draw judgment magnitude was significantly higher in the image condition: "t(161) = 2.02, p = 0.045, d = 0.32". No significant differences for explain or test judgment magnitudes.
"there was a significant difference in judgment magnitude for the draw judgments, with participants in the text-with-image condition giving higher judgments, t(161) = 2.02, p = 0.045, d = 0.32."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Instructional visuals reduced draw relative metacomprehension accuracy compared to text-only condition — related
- Text-only students based draw judgments on internal mental images while image-condition students recalled external visuals — related
- In Studies 1a and 2, instructional visuals produced no significant difference in test performance or in test and explain relative metacomprehension accuracy — related
- Students reported using visual cues for draw judgments but not for test or explain judgments — related
- Students using representation-based cues showed higher draw relative accuracy than those using heuristic cues — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
image-condition-inflated-draw-judgment-magnitude |
title |
Students in the image condition gave higher draw judgment magnitude than text-only students in Study 1a |
description |
Students in the image condition gave higher draw judgment magnitude than text-only students in Study 1a |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
source_checked |
2026-10-19 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jaeger-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.