Imagine Math effects were statistically significant for Indiana grades 3–5 (ES +0.13) but not for other grade bands or for Texas students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 In a 2023–2024 quasi-experimental study in two districts, a statistically significant positive effect was found for Indiana students in grades 3–5 (effect size = +0.13), while effects for other grade bands and for students in Texas were not statistically significant. → Imagine Math by Imagine Learning: Evidence Rating Promising 2024
Evidence¶
Imagine Math by Imagine Learning: Evidence Rating Promising 2024¶
Imagine Math by Imagine Learning: Evidence Rating Promising. (2024). https://www.imaginelearning.com/imagine-math
q2 · i1 · causal · r2
A quasi-experimental study during the 2023–2024 school year in two public school districts in Indiana and Texas, with an analytic sample of 8,379 students in grades 1–8 with fall and spring NWEA MAP Growth Math scores; users were matched with non-users in the same districts.
"In Indiana, a statistically significant positive effect was found for students in grades 3–5 (effect size = +0.13). Effects for other grade bands and for students in Texas were not statistically significant."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Classworks Individualized Learning users scored six points higher on spring math assessment than non-users — related
- K–8 students using Imagine Math in a charter network scored significantly higher than matched non-users on NWEA MAP Growth Math (ES +0.08) — related
- Across grades 1-5, the overall effect of Imagine Math Facts on Ren Star math growth was small (effect size +0.05) — related
- Imagine Math Facts use was not associated with statistically significant growth for upper elementary students (grades 3-5) — related
- TalkingPoints use is associated with significant math score improvements in grades 3-8 — related
- In a Maryland rural fringe district study of over 700 students in grades K-5, Imagine IM showed significant impacts on Acadience Math (+0.26) and Grade 2 NWEA MAP Growth Math (+0.39), with positive but non-significant effects on the state MCAP assessment — related
- Prior HQIM mathematics impact studies show mixed results, with positive effects for Desmos and some Illustrative Mathematics contexts but no significant grade-6 difference — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
imagine-math-indiana-grades-3-5-significant-texas-null |
title |
Imagine Math effects were statistically significant for Indiana grades 3–5 (ES +0.13) but not for other grade bands or for Texas students |
description |
Imagine Math effects were statistically significant for Indiana grades 3–5 (ES +0.13) but not for other grade bands or for Texas students |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — imagine-math-by-imagine-learning-evidence-rating-promising-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.