Alternative student growth measures brought financial costs and implementation challenges around teacher time, test administration, and rigor¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Alternative student growth measures came with financial costs and implementation challenges, especially related to teacher time, test administration, and rigor in evaluating performance. → Moira McCullough 2015
Evidence¶
Moira McCullough 2015¶
Moira McCullough, Brittany English, Megan Hague Angus, Brian Gill. (2015). Alternative Student Growth Measures for Teacher Evaluation: Implementation Experiences of Early-Adopting Districts. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Key finding of the implementation study: districts experienced financial costs and implementation challenges, particularly "teacher time, test administration, and rigor in evaluating performance."
"Alternative student growth measures came with financial costs and implementation challenges, especially related to teacher time, test administration, and rigor in evaluating performance."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Evidence on reliability and validity of alternative student growth measures, especially student learning objectives, is limited — related
- Traditional annual state assessment growth measures typically cover only reading and math in grades 4-8, limiting their use in teacher evaluation — related
- Early-adopting districts used alternative student growth measures alongside other measures in formal teacher evaluations — related
- Incorporating measures of student growth into teacher evaluation systems remained an ongoing challenge for early adopter districts — a broader claim this one bears on
- Districts face validity, reliability, comparability, and accountability-tension challenges in assessing future-ready skills — related
- Integrating POG assessments into traditional standardized-test-centered accountability systems is complex, and lack of a standardized framework can produce inconsistent measurement across regions — related
- States integrate performance-based assessments as a complement or alternative to traditional multiple-choice tests within a broader assessment strategy — related
- Districts implementing new teacher evaluation systems faced challenges using evaluations for instructional improvement — related
- Illinois districts implementing PERA-era teacher evaluation systems experienced challenges cultivating buy-in and understanding among school personnel — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
implementation-costs-and-challenges-growth-measures |
title |
Alternative student growth measures brought financial costs and implementation challenges around teacher time, test administration, and rigor |
description |
Alternative student growth measures brought financial costs and implementation challenges around teacher time, test administration, and rigor |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — moira-mccullough-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.