Claims

Impulsive students' cognitive style tendency appears to shift toward reflective after guided inquiry

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors interpret worksheet corrections as evidence that impulsive students became more careful and reflective over the 12 inquiry meetings. → Margunayasa 2019

Evidence

Margunayasa 2019

Margunayasa, I G., Dantes, N., Marhaeni, A.A.I.N., & Suastra, I W. (2019). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning and Cognitive Style on Science Learning Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 737-750. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1201135

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' observational interpretation of students' worksheets across the 12 meetings, offered as "one of the proofs" of a cognitive-style change from impulsive to reflective; no statistical test is reported for this observation.

"In th e impulsive students’ worksheets, in the prediction section, in the first to fifth meetings there is a tendency to contain corrections, but after entering the sixth to the twelfth meetings there number of corrections become less and less and even disappear"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.