In-between explaining triggered more monitoring of knowledge gaps than after-study explaining (Experiment 1)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-23 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Students in the in-between explaining condition showed a higher proportion of monitoring activities in their verbal protocols than students in the after-study explaining condition. → Lachner 2020
Evidence¶
Lachner 2020¶
Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., Hoogerheide, V., van Gog, T., & Renkl, A. (2020). Timing matters! Explaining between study phases enhances students' learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000396
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Verbal protocol analysis of 89 students' explanation and think-aloud recordings in Experiment 1, coded into idea units with good inter-agreement (.78 < κ > .98), showed the in-between versus after-study contrast on monitoring was significant, "F(1, 86) = 6.57, p = .012, ηp2 = .071".
"the test of the contrast was significant, F(1, 86) = 6.57, p = .012, ηp2 = .071, indicating that in-between explaining triggered students to engage in more monitoring of potential knowledge gaps in early stages of their study phases than after-study explaining"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In-between explaining enhanced university students' conceptual knowledge more than after-study explaining (Experiment 1) — related
- A self-explanation instruction during rereading improves monitoring accuracy for all readers above mere rereading (Experiment 2) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
in-between-explaining-increases-monitoring-activities |
title |
In-between explaining triggered more monitoring of knowledge gaps than after-study explaining (Experiment 1) |
description |
In-between explaining triggered more monitoring of knowledge gaps than after-study explaining (Experiment 1) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
source_checked |
2026-10-23 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lachner-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.