Claims

In-group/out-group bias serves both cognitive efficiency and self-enhancement simultaneously

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? In-group/out-group bias reduces cognitive effort by sorting targets into groups with default approach/avoid responses while boosting self-esteem via favoring the in-group. → Gehlbach 2018

Evidence

Gehlbach 2018

Gehlbach, H., & Vriesema, C. C. (2018). Meta‐bias: A practical theory of motivated thinking. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9454-6

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Theoretical argument in the article's Efficient Self-Enhancement section: building on stereotyping, perceivers categorize people as in-group or out-group and tend to favor the in-group, often to the point of discrimination or derogation of the out-group, serving both meta-biases at once. No new empirical test is reported.

"Perhaps the best example of a bias that serves both motives simultaneously is in-group/out-group bias."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id in-group-out-group-dual-motive-bias
title In-group/out-group bias serves both cognitive efficiency and self-enhancement simultaneously
description In-group/out-group bias serves both cognitive efficiency and self-enhancement simultaneously
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gehlbach-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.