Paragraphs presenting inconsistent information in refutation texts elicit activating epistemic emotions and suppress deactivating emotions, with text condition × paragraph interactions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Significant text condition × paragraph interactions emerged, with activating-emotion differences in the misinformation-description paragraph (e.g., negative refutation vs. non-refutation, b = 1.58, p < 0.001) and no differences in the identical introduction and closing paragraphs. → Jheng 2025
Evidence¶
Jheng 2025¶
Jheng, Y.-L., Catrysse, L., Van de Cruys, S., Kendeou, P., Poels, K. & Gijbels, D. (2025). Investigating epistemic emotions experienced while reading refutation texts through a fine-grained measure of emotion. npj Science of Learning 10, 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00324-3
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Paragraph-level Poisson GLMMs (condition, paragraph, and interaction as fixed effects) in the 56-participant experiment found "Significant interactions were observed between text condition and paragraph"; activating emotions differed in paragraph 2 and paragraph 4, and deactivating emotions differed in paragraph 3, while identical paragraphs 1 and 5 showed no differences.
"Significant interactions were observed between text condition and paragraph. In paragraph 2 (mis- information description), differences in activating emotions were found between negative refutation and non-refutation (b =1 . 5 8 ,p < 0.001)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Emotions — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Text condition shapes in-the-moment epistemic emotions: negative refutation texts raise anxiety and frustration, positive refutation raises curiosity and enjoyment, and non-refutation raises boredom and neutral emotion — related
- Cognitive conflict induced by refutational texts and conflicting perspectives may promote epistemic belief change in student teachers — related
- Negative in-the-moment emotions toward correct-outcome sentences predict significantly lower open-ended knowledge revision scores — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
inconsistent-paragraphs-activate-epistemic-emotions |
title |
Paragraphs presenting inconsistent information in refutation texts elicit activating epistemic emotions and suppress deactivating emotions, with text condition × paragraph interactions |
description |
Paragraphs presenting inconsistent information in refutation texts elicit activating epistemic emotions and suppress deactivating emotions, with text condition × paragraph interactions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jheng-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.