Claims

An educational programme based on independent activities produced significantly higher post-test grades in pedagogical subjects than classic methods for 11th-grade pedagogical-profile students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test grades of the experimental focus group were statistically significantly higher than those of the control focus group (t=7.122; df=138.305; p<0.001). → Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş 2017

Evidence

Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş 2017

Monica-Iuliana Anca & Muşata Bocoş. (2017). The Role of Independent Activities in Development of Strategic Learning Competences and Increase of School Performance Level, within the Study of High School Pedagogy. Educatia 21 Journal, (15). https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2017.15.07

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pedagogical experiment comparing an experimental focus group (n=84) that received the independent-activities programme with a control focus group (n=81); post-test averages were 7.33 versus 5.92, a statistically significant difference per the printed t test.

"The result at t test for independent focus groups revealed that the grades average at the post-test for the experimental focus group is significantly different, from statistical point of view, from the grades average at the post-test for the control focus group (t=7.122; df=138.305; p<0 .001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.