Claims

Individual differences in metacognitive knowledge expressions relate to children's mathematical competence and verbalization style

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Dennis, the higher-competence child, made no statements about weakness in his own performance, while Michael, the lower-competence child, made such statements in most activities. → Ebru Aydın 2022 q2 i? Michael frequently displayed thinking-aloud behaviors while Dennis was more hesitant to express his own cognitive processes, suggesting differences in internalization of private speech. → Ebru Aydın 2022 (2)

Evidence

Ebru Aydın 2022

Ebru Aydın, Çağlayan Dinçer. (2022). “I did it wrong, but i know it”: Young children’s metacognitive knowledge expressions during peer interactions in math activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity 45 (2022) 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101104

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Cross-case comparison across the 16 activities: Dennis never stated weaknesses in his own performance, while Michael did so in most activities. The authors link this to Michael's teacher-observed lack of mathematical competence.

"Unlike Dennis, Michael made statements about weaknesses in his own performance in most of the activities. Before the implementations, it was observed by the class teacher that Michael lacked mathematical competence. This may indicate that Michael has awareness of his own performance."

Ebru Aydın 2022 (2)

Ebru Aydın, Çağlayan Dinçer. (2022). “I did it wrong, but i know it”: Young children’s metacognitive knowledge expressions during peer interactions in math activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity 45 (2022) 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101104

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Observation across activities: Michael frequently thought aloud while Dennis was more hesitant to express his own cognitive processes. The authors relate this to private speech becoming gradually internalized with maturation.

"It should also be noted that Michael frequently displayed thinking-aloud behaviors during the activities. Although we investigated behavioral expressions in depth, especially through video recordings, it is obvious that verbal indicators are clearer and more interpretable."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id individual-differences-metacognitive-expressions
title Individual differences in metacognitive knowledge expressions relate to children's mathematical competence and verbalization style
description Individual differences in metacognitive knowledge expressions relate to children's mathematical competence and verbalization style
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — ebru-aydın-2022, ebru-aydın-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.