Claims

Children differ substantially in peer-nominated prosocial behavior in elementary classrooms

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In upper elementary classes, children averaged 7 prosocial nominations with an SD of 4 peers, indicating clear between-child differences. → Krijnen 2024

Evidence

Krijnen 2024

Krijnen, M. A., Wansink, B. G. J., van den Berg, Y. H. M., van Tartwijk, J., & Mainhard, T. (2024). Citizenship in the Elementary Classroom Through the Lens of Peer Relations. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09870-5

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Boor-Klip et al. (2017), a study of 59 upper elementary classes of approximately 25 children in which "the reported standard deviation was 4 peers" around a mean of 7 prosocial nominations, with some children receiving none and others 20 or more.

"children were, on average, nominated by 7 classmates as being prosocial; however, the reported standard deviation was 4 peers, indicating clear differences between children."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id individual-differences-prosocial-nominations
title Children differ substantially in peer-nominated prosocial behavior in elementary classrooms
description Children differ substantially in peer-nominated prosocial behavior in elementary classrooms
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — krijnen-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.