Individual interest is a stable positive predictor of academic achievement, while seductive details harm recall and transfer¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2·q2–q3·i1–i2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Individual interest correlates with academic achievement (mean r = .31 in K-12 studies; smaller within-country correlations in PISA data). → Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023
q2 i1 Seductive details (interesting but irrelevant information) show an average negative effect of g = −.33 on recall or transfer. → Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023¶
Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
q3 · i2 · review · r2
Meta-analysis reported in the interest theory section determined a "mean correlation coefficient of r = .31 between interest and academic achievement" for K-12 studies; PISA within-country correlations were smaller (r = .16, r = .15).
"Schiefele et al. (1992) determined a mean correlation coefficient of r = .31 between interest and academic achievement for studies in K-12 classes."
Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023 (2)¶
Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
q2 · i1 · review · r2
Sundararajan and Adesope's meta-analysis on seductive details, reported in the interest theory section, found "an average negative effect of g = − .33" on recall or transfer; no meta-analyses of situational interest were known to the authors.
"They found an average negative effect of g = − .33 for the relation between seductive details and recall or transfer of presented information."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Interest — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Motivation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Interesting but irrelevant details can impair comprehension and transfer, with effects that vary with the material and the learner — a broader claim this one bears on
- Coherence Principle Irrelevant Material Hurts Learning — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Interest correlates moderately with academic achievement (mean correlation r = .31, meta-analytic) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- No seductive details effect on transfer was observed, and no definitive conclusions about comprehension effects can be drawn from the multiple-choice transfer data — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
individual-interest-predicts-achievement |
title |
Individual interest is a stable positive predictor of academic achievement, while seductive details harm recall and transfer |
description |
Individual interest is a stable positive predictor of academic achievement, while seductive details harm recall and transfer |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — detlef-urhahne-lisette-wijnia-2023, detlef-urhahne-lisette-wijnia-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.