Claims

Repeated training substantially reduces the proportion of biased responders and increases improved and correct responders at the individual level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? After Session 1, 47.9% of training-group participants were classified as improved responders versus 11.8% in control, while biased responders were 23.7% versus 66.1%. → Nina Franiatte 2024 q3 i? After Session 2, only 12.1% of the training group remained biased responders, and 70.9% were correct responders. → Nina Franiatte 2024 (2)

Evidence

Nina Franiatte 2024

Nina Franiatte, Esther Boissin, Alexandra Delmas, Wim De Neys. (2024). Boosting Debiasing: Impact of Repeated Training on Reasoning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101845

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Individual-level direction-of-change classification (Raoelison & De Neys, 2019; categories from Boissin et al., 2021, 2022) of all 120 Session 1 reasoners into biased, correct, improved, and other categories.

"They amounted to 11.8% of reasoners in the control group and 47.9% in the training group."

Nina Franiatte 2024 (2)

Nina Franiatte, Esther Boissin, Alexandra Delmas, Wim De Neys. (2024). Boosting Debiasing: Impact of Repeated Training on Reasoning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101845

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Session 2 individual-level classification: 70.9% of the training group were correct responders giving majority "11" patterns (vs 27.4% in control), improved reasoners rose 15.1% (vs 4.8% spontaneous improvement in control), and only 12.1% remained biased.

"Finally, in the training group there only remained 12.1% biased responders (vs 66.1% in the control group"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id individual-level-improved-responders-after-repeated-training
title Repeated training substantially reduces the proportion of biased responders and increases improved and correct responders at the individual level
description Repeated training substantially reduces the proportion of biased responders and increases improved and correct responders at the individual level
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — nina-franiatte-2024, nina-franiatte-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.