Individual-level analysis alone is insufficient for understanding learning in digital environments.¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The divide between variances of network activities and perceived learning potential shows that merely looking at the individual level is not enough. → Ünlüsoy 2013

Evidence¶

Ünlüsoy 2013¶

Ünlüsoy, A., de Haan, M.J., Leander, K., & Völker, B. (2013). Learning potential in youth's online networks: A multilevel approach. Computers & Education, 69, 522-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.007

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Multilevel analyses revealed a divide between variances of network activities and perceived learning potential, showing that individual-level analysis alone is insufficient for understanding digital learning.

"The divide between the variances of our two dependent variables -network activities and perceived learning potential- underpin that if we want to understand how young people learn in digital environments, merely looking at the individual level is not enough."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Heuristics alone do not prepare network designers or teachers to enact student-centered online learning environments — related
• The review reports that connecting possible selves to concrete strategies is an essential precursor to positive behavior, beyond merely holding possible selves — a broader claim this one bears on
• Network activities predict perceived learning potential among youth in online networks. — related