Claims

The inductive vocabulary intervention transferred to ITBS Reading comprehension achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A parallel HLM analysis with ITBS Reading as outcome found significant Treatment main effect, t(66) = -2.95, p < .01, and Treatment x Grade interaction, t(1431) = 2.99, p < .003, with a significant combined effect, Chi-Square (2df) = 11.90, p < .003. → Michael R. Vitale & Nancy R. Romance 2013

Evidence

Michael R. Vitale & Nancy R. Romance 2013

Michael R. Vitale & Nancy R. Romance. (2013). Accelerating Vocabulary Development and Reading Comprehension in Grades 3-4-5 through an Inductive Vocabulary Model. SREE Fall 2013 Conference Abstract. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563063

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Parallel 2-level HLM analysis of ITBS Reading pre-post scores in the same quasi-experimental design. The combined Treatment and Treatment x Grade follow-up test was "significant, Chi-Square (2df) = 11.90, p < .003". No effect size was printed.

"The result of this follow-up analysis was significant, Chi-Square (2df) = 11.90, p < .003, confirming the impact of the Vocabulary Intervention on student ITBS Reading achievement."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.