Ineffective learning strategies show substantially higher habit strength than effective strategies in a proof-of-concept survey¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a proof-of-concept study, strategy effectiveness significantly predicted habit strength, with ineffective strategies (rereading, highlighting) associated with higher habit strength than effective strategies (self-testing, concept mapping). → Ann-Kathrin Krause 2025
Evidence¶
Ann-Kathrin Krause 2025¶
Ann-Kathrin Krause, Jasmin Breitwieser, Garvin Brod. (2025). Understanding Learning Strategy Use Through the Lens of Habit. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10087-3
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Proof-of-concept survey of 64 Bachelor's and Master's students rating habit strength of four strategies via SRHI items on a 7-point Likert scale. A linear mixed-effects regression with planned contrasts found "a statistically significant effect of strategy effectiveness on habit strength"; the model explained 41% of variance (R²marginal = 0.41). No standardized effect size was printed.
"The analysis revealed a statistically significant effect of strategy effectiveness on habit strength, B = 2.43, SE = 0.18, p <.001, indicating that the ineffective strategies were associated with substantially higher habit strength than the effective strategies."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Descriptive habit-strength ratings rank highlighting highest, followed by rereading, self-testing, and concept mapping — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Summarization, highlighting, the keyword mnemonic, imagery for text, and rereading receive low utility assessments — a broader claim this one bears on
- Highlighting shows low utility for improving learning outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
- Rereading Is A Low Utility Study Strategy — a broader claim this one bears on
- Learners misjudge which learning strategies are effective — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ineffective-strategies-higher-habit-strength |
title |
Ineffective learning strategies show substantially higher habit strength than effective strategies in a proof-of-concept survey |
description |
Ineffective learning strategies show substantially higher habit strength than effective strategies in a proof-of-concept survey |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ann-kathrin-krause-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.