All four groups showed a tendency toward knowledge sharing, presenting information without interpretation or evaluation¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In every group, a large share of information items was described without being interpreted or evaluated, ranging from 35.4% (Group B) to 66.7% (Group C). → Jan van Aalst 2009

Evidence¶

Jan van Aalst 2009¶

Jan van Aalst. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative analysis of the Information main code across the four group discourses. The percentages of uninterpreted information are descriptive; the article links the pattern to a realist epistemology in which information is assumed to be self-explanatory.

"The Information code revealed a tendency toward knowledge sharing in all groups: the many instances where information was presented without interpretation or evaluation (Group C, 66.7%; Group D, 61.2%; Group A, 50.0%, Group B, 35.4%)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Knowledge creation occurred in neither fixed nor opportunistic collaboration groups; interactions were mostly knowledge sharing — related
• Premature shared understanding: a group's bypassing of a member's skeptical comment left the social and technology objects misaligned, with partial agreement (Extract 3) — related
• Participants' prior knowledge about the historical event was entirely consistent with their own ethnic group's narrative, with none providing an alternative interpretation — related
• A coding scheme distinguishing knowledge creation from knowledge sharing and construction can differentiate student groups' engagement in knowledge creation — related