Descriptive patterns link infrequently reported experiences to initial self-efficacy: teaching others and no impact were reported by higher self-efficacy students, consulting a teacher by lower¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students reporting Teaching/Guiding Others and No Impact had higher mean initial self-efficacy, while students reporting Consulting with a Teacher had lower mean initial self-efficacy. → Aikens 2023
Evidence¶
Aikens 2023¶
Aikens, M. L., & Kulacki, A. R. (2023). Identifying Group Work Experiences That Increase Students' Self-Efficacy for Quantitative Biology Tasks. CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-04-0076
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Descriptive statistics from Table 3 for experiences reported in fewer than 35 of 429 responses; models with these outcomes failed to converge, so only raw mean differences are reported and no inferential test or effect size is printed.
"Students who reported Teaching /Guiding Others and No Impact had higher initial self-efficacy, on average, than students who did not report these experiences. Students who reported Consulting with a Teacher had lower initial self-efficacy, on average, than students who did not report this experience."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Mastery experiences may not be the optimal method for initially increasing preservice agriculture teachers' self-efficacy — related
- Vicarious experiences are positively related to agriculture teachers' general teaching efficacy, with observing a first year teacher explaining 11% of variance — related
- Female students reported significantly lower initial self-efficacy for quantitative biology problems than male students, with small effect sizes — related
- Lower initial self-efficacy significantly increased the odds of students reporting that getting help from peers increased their self-efficacy — related
- Gender/sex predicted reporting that getting help from peers increased self-efficacy when modeled alone, but this relationship was attenuated after accounting for initial self-efficacy — related
- Higher initial self-efficacy increased the odds of students reporting that accomplishing the problems increased their self-efficacy — related
- Students' self-efficacy for quantitative biology tasks significantly increased after completing collaborative group work assignments, with large effect sizes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
infrequent-experiences-descriptive-self-efficacy-patterns |
title |
Descriptive patterns link infrequently reported experiences to initial self-efficacy: teaching others and no impact were reported by higher self-efficacy students, consulting a teacher by lower |
description |
Descriptive patterns link infrequently reported experiences to initial self-efficacy: teaching others and no impact were reported by higher self-efficacy students, consulting a teacher by lower |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — aikens-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.