Claims

Associations between inhibition and word reading are task-dependent, ranging from negligible to large (r = .59)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Some inhibition-word reading pairs show large associations, e.g., interference control with TOWRE word reading (r = .59). → Ting Zhou 2026 q2 i? Other inhibition-word reading pairs show negligible associations, e.g., Simon task with the Single Word Reading Test. → Ting Zhou 2026 (2)

Evidence

Ting Zhou 2026

Ting Zhou, Thuy Anh Nguyen, Aprezo Pardodi Maba, Damon Thomas, Young-Suk Grace Kim, Elizabeth J. Edwards. (2026). Executive Functions and Reading in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10160-5

q2 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r?

Qualitative synthesis of 13 inhibition-word reading studies. Two reported large effects, including "interference control task to measure inhibition and the TOWRE to assess word reading (r = .59)"; the other reported r = .53 with WJ Letter-Word Identification.

"two studies yielded large effects: one using interference control task to measure inhibition and the TOWRE to assess word reading (r = .59; Meiri et al., 2019)"

Ting Zhou 2026 (2)

Ting Zhou, Thuy Anh Nguyen, Aprezo Pardodi Maba, Damon Thomas, Young-Suk Grace Kim, Elizabeth J. Edwards. (2026). Executive Functions and Reading in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10160-5

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Qualitative synthesis contrast: the same inhibition domain (interference control) showed a negligible association when paired with the Single Word Reading Test, unlike Stroop-based pairs with WRMT Word Identification and WIAT Word Reading.

"when interference control was indexed by the Simon task and word reading assessed using The Single Word Reading Test, the association was negligible (Babayiğit et al., 2022)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id inhibition-word-reading-task-dependent
title Associations between inhibition and word reading are task-dependent, ranging from negligible to large (r = .59)
description Associations between inhibition and word reading are task-dependent, ranging from negligible to large (r = .59)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — ting-zhou-2026, ting-zhou-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.