'Innovative' schools used more different tools per learning arrangement than 'traditional' schools¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Per learning arrangement, 'traditional' schools used one to three tools while most 'innovative' school arrangements were supported by three or more tools. → Sandra de Koster 2017

Evidence¶

Sandra de Koster 2017¶

Sandra de Koster, Monique Volman, Els Kuiper. (2017). Concept-guided development of technology in 'traditional' and 'innovative' schools: quantitative and qualitative differences in technology integration. Education Tech Research Dev 65:1325–1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9527-0

q2 · i? · design · r2

Quantitative characterization from the embedded case studies of learning arrangements (Tables 2–6). The article states "at the ‘traditional’ schools only one to three different tools were used per learning arrangement" versus three or more at 'innovative' schools.

"at the ‘traditional’ schools only one to three different tools were used per learning arrangement (as can be seen in Tables 2, 3), while at the ‘innovative’ schools most learning arrangements were supported by three or more tools"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Concept-guided development produced no significant difference between 'traditional' and 'innovative' schools in the total number of different technology tools used — related