Claims

Input Enhancement strategy improved the vocabulary knowledge of Iranian EFL learners over a three-month treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The Input Enhancement group's vocabulary performance improved significantly from pretest to seen posttest after the three-month treatment. → Masoudi 2017

Evidence

Masoudi 2017

Golfam Masoudi. (2017). The Effect of Vocabulary Self-Selection Strategy and Input Enhancement Strategy on the Vocabulary Knowledge of Iranian EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n8p32

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired t-test on the 20-learner Input Enhancement group's 50-item vocabulary pretest and seen posttest after 24 sessions of selecting from textually highlighted words. The article reports t=33.03, df=19, and concludes the strategy "was effective in improving vocabulary knowledge of Iranian EFL learners".

"The comparison of the means on the pretest and posttest scores of Input Enhancement group indicated that there was a statistically difference (t=33.03, df=19, p=0. 000>0.05) between the perform ance of Input Enhancement group in pretest and achievement posttest"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.