Claims

Grade XI EFL students taught reading comprehension with the INSERT strategy achieved higher scores than those taught with SQ3R

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students taught with INSERT scored higher on a reading comprehension test than students taught with SQ3R (F observed 27.32 > F table 3.98). → Busmin Gurning & Aguslani Siregar 2017

Evidence

Busmin Gurning & Aguslani Siregar 2017

Busmin Gurning & Aguslani Siregar. (2017). The Effect of Teaching Strategies and Curiosity on Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n11p191

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental study of 76 grade XI students in two classes (38 each), taught over six meetings in five weeks, analyzed with two-way ANOVA at α = 0.05; the article reports "The students’ achievement in Reading Comprehension taught by using INSERT strategy was higher" with F obs (27.32) > F tab (3.98).

"The students’ achievement in Reading Comprehension taught by using INSERT strategy was higher that those taught by using SQ3R strategy was really true"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.