Claims

The editorial proposes an institutional applied-psychology profession: thorough laboratory training without a full medical course, routine technical duties under a superintendent, and physician-level rank and salary for stability

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 1910 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The proposed institutional psychologist receives thorough laboratory training but not a full medical course, serves as a practical psychologist whose routine work is his main business, and holds rank and salary about that of a physician. → Are We Afraid of Competition? The Function of Examinations 1910

Evidence

Are We Afraid of Competition? The Function of Examinations 1910

Are We Afraid of Competition? The Function of Examinations. (1910). The Journal of Educational Psychology, 1. https://psycnet.apa.org/journal/edu

q1 · i? · theoretical · r1

An editorial proposal, not a study: the author specifies the conditions of a new professional position in institutional applied psychology, saying the rank and salary should be "about that of a physician" for stability, that laboratory training should be thorough without a full medical course, and that women might well qualify for the position.

"Women might well qualify for the position and find it an attractive field. The rank and salary should be about that of a physician"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.