Coaching effects on instruction and achievement are positively correlated, but large instructional improvements are needed for modest achievement gains¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across 20 studies reporting both outcomes, the weighted correlation between averaged instruction and achievement effect sizes is 0.37 (p = .16). → Kraft 2018
Evidence¶
Kraft 2018¶
Kraft, M.A., Blazar, D., Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547-588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
q2 · i? · the printed figure is a between-study correlation of effect sizes (r = 0.37, p = .16), not an effect size for a finding · quant-synthesis · r3
Between-study weighted correlation using averaged effect sizes per research project; the printed correlation is r = 0.37 (p = .16). Exploratory because the instruction-achievement relationship itself cannot be interpreted causally within these data.
"Across a small sample of 20 studies from 16 research projects that included both outcome measures, the strength of the weighted correlation between averaged effect sizes on instruction and achievement is 0.37 (p = .16; see also Figure 3)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teacher coaching raises student achievement on standardized tests by a pooled 0.18 SD across 31 causal studies — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Teacher coaching programs improve teachers' instructional practice by a pooled 0.49 SD across 43 causal studies — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it¶
- A practitioner review reports a meta-analysis of causal coaching studies as finding positive effects of coaching on teachers' instructional practice and student achievement, though one contrasting study found coached teachers no more effective — related
- Both pedagogy-expertise-weighted and unanimous-vote ensembles frequently worsen LLM alignment with student learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
instruction-achievement-weak-link-coaching |
title |
Coaching effects on instruction and achievement are positively correlated, but large instructional improvements are needed for modest achievement gains |
description |
Coaching effects on instruction and achievement are positively correlated, but large instructional improvements are needed for modest achievement gains |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kraft-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.