Claims

Instructional design principles are rarely reported in medical CBL software, with the media principle most common at 29.5% of studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across 251 studies, instructional design principles were infrequently reported: the media principle appeared in 74 studies (29.5%), segmenting in 34 (13.6%), contiguity in 23 (9.2%), and others at 6.4% or below. → Taveira-Gomes T 2016

Evidence

Taveira-Gomes T 2016

Taveira-Gomes T, Ferreira P, Taveira-Gomes I, Severo M, Ferreira MA. (2016). What Are We Looking for in Computer-Based Learning Interventions in Medical Education? A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5461

q2 · i? · review · r3

Prevalence analysis across the 251 abstracted articles, with instructional design principles inferred from descriptions and figures using standardized criteria when not explicitly reported. The review argues missing design reports "obfuscates the effect of different intervention aspects."

"The media principle was apparent in 74 studies (29.5%, ICC=.94), followed by the segmenting principle in 34 studies (13.6%, ICC=.98) and the contiguity principle in 23 studies (9.2%, ICC=1.00)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.