Claims

External feedback, use of instruments (especially rubrics), and formative/qualitative purpose increase students' perceived usefulness of self-assessment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · review r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Self-assessment with external feedback, mainly from teachers, was perceived as more valuable. → Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023 q2 i? Students regarded rubrics as the most helpful self-assessment instrument. → Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023 (2) q2 i? Students valued self-assessment for learning improvement or with qualitative methods over summative use. → Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023 (3)

Evidence

Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023

Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan. (2023). A Systematic Review on Students' Perceptions of Self-Assessment: Usefulness and Factors Influencing Implementation. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09799-1

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis of eight studies on external feedback: teacher feedback "helps make clear expectations of learning tasks and identify areas where they need to devote more time"; lack of immediate feedback was reported as a barrier.

"Self-assessment with external feedback, mainly from teachers, was perceived to be more valuable by students"

Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023 (2)

Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan. (2023). A Systematic Review on Students' Perceptions of Self-Assessment: Usefulness and Factors Influencing Implementation. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09799-1

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review synthesis of six studies on instruments: students perceived rubrics as "a reference for meaningful self-assessment" and used them to pinpoint errors; the global rating scale was preferred over the more rigid checklist scale.

"Compared with checklists and learning logs, students regarded rubrics as the most helpful tool (42)."

Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan 2023 (3)

Zi Yan · Ernesto Panadero · Xiang Wang · Ying Zhan. (2023). A Systematic Review on Students' Perceptions of Self-Assessment: Usefulness and Factors Influencing Implementation. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09799-1

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis: only four studies explicitly discussed purpose; students valued self-assessment for learning improvement even without better marks, while summative contexts appeared less useful because students focused too much on marks.

"Most studies favoured self-assessment for learning improvement or those with qualitative methods."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id instructional-factors-perceived-usefulness-self-assessment
title External feedback, use of instruments (especially rubrics), and formative/qualitative purpose increase students' perceived usefulness of self-assessment
description External feedback, use of instruments (especially rubrics), and formative/qualitative purpose increase students' perceived usefulness of self-assessment
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — zi-yan-ernesto-panadero-xiang-wang-ying-zhan-2023, zi-yan-ernesto-panadero-xiang-wang-ying-zhan-2023-2, zi-yan-ernesto-panadero-xiang-wang-ying-zhan-2023-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.