Claims

The dominant school-based CPR interventions were instructor-led training with video simulations, assessed mainly by subjective questionnaires

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the majority of included studies, interventions were instructor-led basic CPR training with video simulations of chest compressions or basic CPR theoretical training. → Zenani 2022 q3 i? The outcome measure used by most studies was subjective questionnaires assessing CPR knowledge and skill. → Zenani 2022

Evidence

Zenani 2022

Zenani, N.E., Bello, B., Molekodi, M., & Useh, U., 2022, 'Effectiveness of school-based CPR training among adolescents to enhance knowledge and skills in CPR: A systematic review', Curationis 45(1), a2325. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2325

q3 · i? · review · r2

Characteristics synthesis of the 14 included studies. The review reports the majority used instructor-led training with video simulations or theoretical training, and that "the outcome measure used by most of the studies was subjective questionnaires"; few studies used virtual reality and video gaming.

"In the participating schools, the interventions used to assess the effects of CPR among adolescents in the majority of the studies were mainly instructor-led basic CPR training with video simulations of chest compressions or basic CPR theoretical training."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.