Instructor body posture affects students' perceived instructor communion on both the vertical and the horizontal dimension¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr3·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 In the pilot experiment, perceived communion was significantly affected by both posture dimensions, with the strongest difference between the high and low power conditions. → Traulsen 2024
q3 i1 In the preregistered experiment, perceived communion showed significant vertical, horizontal, and interaction effects, revealing the strong influence of the horizontal dimension. → Traulsen 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Traulsen 2024¶
Traulsen, S. J., & Zander, L. (2024). Straighten your back, open your arms! Effects of instructor's body postures in educational videos on students' interest and motivation. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101959
q3 · i1 · causal · r3
Pilot experiment, 2×2 ANOVA on perceived communion (α = .92); both dimensions significant (partial η2 = .021 and .056), no interaction, and communion lowest in the slumped/closed condition.
"Perceived communion was significantly affected by the vertical dimension, F (1, 190) = 3.996, p = .047, partial η2 = .021, and the horizontal dimension, F (1, 190) = 11.304, p < .001, partial η2 = .056."
Traulsen 2024 (2)¶
Traulsen, S. J., & Zander, L. (2024). Straighten your back, open your arms! Effects of instructor's body postures in educational videos on students' interest and motivation. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101959
q3 · i1 · causal · r3
Preregistered experiment with 434 students; both main effects significant (partial η2 = .021 and .128) plus a significant interaction (partial η2 = .036), with the largest pairwise difference involving slumped/closed.
"there were significant main effects of the vertical dimension, F (1, 430) = 9.087, p = .003, partial η2 = .021, and the horizontal dimension, F (1, 430) = 63.046, p < .001, partial η2 = .128, on perceived communion."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Instructor body posture affects students' perceived instructor agency, mainly through the vertical dimension — related
- An instructor's upright versus slumped and open versus closed body posture in an educational video affects students' perceived instructor enthusiasm on both dimensions — related
- Instructor body posture affects students' liking of the instructor on both dimensions and their interaction, mainly driven by the slumped/closed condition — related
- Instructor body posture shows no direct effects on students' situational interest, but indirect-only mediation effects through perceived enthusiasm — related
- Instructor body posture shows no significant main or interaction effects on students' motivation, though pairwise contrasts favour conditions over slumped/closed — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
instructor-posture-affects-perceived-communion |
title |
Instructor body posture affects students' perceived instructor communion on both the vertical and the horizontal dimension |
description |
Instructor body posture affects students' perceived instructor communion on both the vertical and the horizontal dimension |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — traulsen-2024, traulsen-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.