Perceived instrumentality enhances student motivation only for students with a positive attitude toward their personal future; for students with a negative future outlook, high utility has the opposite effect¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2004 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Perceived instrumentality interacts with affective attitudes toward one's individual future: it enhances motivation only under a positive personal future attitude and reverses under a negative outlook. → Phalet 2004
Evidence¶
Phalet 2004¶
Phalet, K., Andriessen, I., & Lens, W. (2004). How Future Goals Enhance Motivation and Learning in Multicultural Classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 16, No. 1. https://hdl.handle.net/1874/23520
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports, citing Van Calster et al. (1991), a study of Grade 11 and 12 students in which high-instrumentality students were more motivated than low-instrumentality students, and an interaction effect with affective attitudes toward one's individual future was found. No effect size is printed.
"Perceived instrumentality does enhance student motivation but only for students with a positive attitude toward their personal future. For students with a negative outlook on their future, attaching high utility to school results had the opposite effect on their motivation to study."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The attitude-achievement paradox: disadvantaged minority youth may show low achievement despite high motivation to achieve upward mobility through schooling — related
- Teachers who believe AI will help them reach professional goals and improve students' learning outcomes (utility value) may be more motivated to use it (theoretical argument). — related
- Learners invest more effort in tasks they perceive as interesting, personally important, or useful to their future goals. — a broader claim this one bears on
- Students perceiving high task value exert greater effort and achieve more than students perceiving low value — related
- Students with positive perceptions of the instrumentality of schoolwork for future goals are more motivated, use more effective learning strategies, and perform better in school — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
instrumentality-future-attitude-interaction |
title |
Perceived instrumentality enhances student motivation only for students with a positive attitude toward their personal future; for students with a negative future outlook, high utility has the opposite effect |
description |
Perceived instrumentality enhances student motivation only for students with a positive attitude toward their personal future; for students with a negative future outlook, high utility has the opposite effect |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2004 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — phalet-2004 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.