Claims

The Interactive Story Reading Method produced significant pretest-to-posttest gains in receptive language vocabulary in the experiment group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Experiment group children's receptive language standard scores rose significantly from pretest to posttest (z=-4.458, p=0.001). → Okyay 2017

Evidence

Okyay 2017

Okyay, O. & Kandir, A. (2017). Impact of the Interactive Story Reading Method on Receptive and Expressive Language Vocabulary of Children. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 395-406. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1149725

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Wilcoxon Signed Rank analysis of TIFALDI receptive subtest pretest/posttest standard scores for the 26-child experiment group; the article reports "a statistically significant difference" with z= -4.458; p=0.001. No effect size is printed.

"reveal a statistically significant difference between the pre -test and post -test standard scores achieved by the children in the experiment group (z= -4.458; p=0.001) (p<0.05)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.