Claims

Initial interest levels were significantly lower than initial self-concept levels in both math and L1

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Intercepts of math and L1 interest were significantly lower than intercepts of self-concept in both domains. → Anna Widlund 2023

Evidence

Anna Widlund 2023

Anna Widlund, Markku Niemivirta, Heta Tuominen, Johan Korhonen. (2023). Growth Trajectories of Self-Concept and Interest in Mathematics and Language – Individual Differences and Cross-Domain Relations. Preprint version 1. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5563-5044

q2 · i? · associational · r2

From the one-class growth model of the 612-student sample: "The initial levels of math and L1 interest (i.e., intercepts) were significantly lower compared to the initial levels of self-concept"; no effect size printed.

"The initial levels of math and L1 interest (i.e., intercepts) were significantly lower compared to the initial levels of self-concept, in both domains."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id interest-levels-lower-than-self-concept
title Initial interest levels were significantly lower than initial self-concept levels in both math and L1
description Initial interest levels were significantly lower than initial self-concept levels in both math and L1
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — anna-widlund-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.