Claims

Students' perception of science instruction as interesting is positively associated with their emotional engagement in science

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a two-level multilevel model, each unit increase in perceived interesting science instruction is associated with a 0.32 increase in emotional engagement (b = 0.32, CI [0.25, 0.38], p < 0.001). → Xin Xia 2026

Evidence

Xin Xia 2026

Xin Xia, Robert Tai. (2026). Exploring the association of student perceptions of science instruction and emotional engagement: The variance between grade level. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09800-8

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Two-level organizational multilevel model (Model 3) of 6,465 students nested in 25 schools, controlling for grade, sex, race/ethnicity, and understandable-science perception. The article reports "b = 0.32, CI = [0.25, 0.38], p-value < 0.001" for the interesting-science slope.

"For each unit increase in the perception of interesting science teaching, there's an associated 0.32 increase in the emotional engagement score statistically significantly, holding all other variables constant ( b = 0.32, CI = [0.25, 0.38], p-value < 0.001)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id interesting-science-instruction-associated-emotional-engagement
title Students' perception of science instruction as interesting is positively associated with their emotional engagement in science
description Students' perception of science instruction as interesting is positively associated with their emotional engagement in science
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
source_checked 2026-10-18
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — xin-xia-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.