Claims

Interleaved mathematics assignments nearly doubled final test performance compared with blocked assignments in seventh grade (72% vs. 38%, d = 1.05)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 On the final test, students who received interleaved assignments scored 72% versus 38% for blocked assignments, t(139) = 10.49, p < .0001, Cohen's d = 1.05. → Rohrer et al. 2013

Evidence

Rohrer et al. 2013

Doug Rohrer, Robert F. Dedrick, Kaleena Burgess. (2013). An Efficacy Study of Interleaved Mathematics Practice. SREE Fall 2013 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563060

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Classroom-based controlled experiment at a large public middle school in Tampa, Florida, with three teachers and 140 seventh grade students in a counterbalanced crossover design. The Results section reports the final test contrast: "interleaved assignments were nearly twice as effective as blocked assignments, 72% vs. 38%" with d = 1.05.

"Final test scores revealed that interleaved assignments were nearly twice as effective as blocked assignments, 72% vs. 38%, t (139) = 10.49, p < .0001 (Cohen's d = 1.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.