Cross-sector committee members report that an organizing intermediary's structure made collaboration generative and productive¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Members experienced the structured co-design process as generative, with each session building on the prior and increasing momentum and productivity. → Babineau 2025

Evidence¶

Babineau 2025¶

Babineau, K., Shah, Z., Jacobs, B., Miller, A., Alvarado, B., Aguirre, N., Fennelly-Atkinson, R., & Young, V. (2025). Building Bridges: Cultivating Interconnectedness for STEM Pathways in San Diego. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/254

q2 · i? · qualitative · r1

Same qualitative interview study of steering committee members. Participants described a well-documented, well-structured process and reported that "each session was building on the prior, leading to an increased sense of momentum and productivity".

"Members believed the process was generative and felt as though each session was building on the prior, leading to an increased sense of momentum and productivity"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Committee members hold that driving systems-level change requires actively and directly engaging local communities rather than passively asking for feedback — related
• Structural Fragmentation of HRM Functions Impedes Strategic Coordination in School Districts — related
• School co-locations or partnerships, aspiring-leader programs, and shared Common Core preparation are the most promising avenues for cross-sector collaboration — related
• Limited school staff time is a crucial obstacle impeding cross-sector collaboration — related