Claims

The likelihood of being identified as at risk increases as historically underserved background characteristics intersect, with variation by gender and race/ethnicity, and school characteristics also matter

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · associational r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 3 of 3 entries) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students belonging to more historically underserved groups have a greater chance of being identified as at risk; students in all three groups have an even higher likelihood. → Mariann Lemke 2024 q2 i? The increase varies by gender and background: female English learners and special education students are more likely to be identified than males across ethnoracial groups; Asian students show the smallest increases. → Mariann Lemke 2024 (2) q2 i? Students in schools with above-average low income percentages, below-average teacher retention, and below-average attendance have a higher likelihood of significant risk. → Mariann Lemke 2024 (3)

Evidence

Mariann Lemke 2024

Mariann Lemke, Dan Murphy, Aaron Soo Ping Chow, and Angela Acuña. (2024). Early Literacy Performance in Massachusetts: Results of Ongoing Analysis of Literacy Screening Assessments. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED663754

q2 · i? · associational · r2

New intersectional analysis examining students' overlapping social and economic background characteristics in combination, using a statistical model described in the report's appendix.

"students who receive special education or English learner support services and come from a low income background have a greater likelihood of being identified as at risk than do students with only one of these characteristics. And students belonging to all three groups have an even higher likelihood of being identified as at risk."

Mariann Lemke 2024 (2)

Mariann Lemke, Dan Murphy, Aaron Soo Ping Chow, and Angela Acuña. (2024). Early Literacy Performance in Massachusetts: Results of Ongoing Analysis of Literacy Screening Assessments. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED663754

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The intersectional analysis finds the pattern of increasing risk with intersecting characteristics holds for all students, but the size of the increase varies by gender and other background factors.

"Female students who are English learners or who receive special education services are more likely to be identified as at risk than males across ethnoracial groups. Asian students show the smallest increases in likelihood of being identified as at risk across ethnoracial groups."

Mariann Lemke 2024 (3)

Mariann Lemke, Dan Murphy, Aaron Soo Ping Chow, and Angela Acuña. (2024). Early Literacy Performance in Massachusetts: Results of Ongoing Analysis of Literacy Screening Assessments. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED663754

q2 · i? · associational · r3

School-level characteristics were included in the likelihood analysis; the report notes that in Massachusetts more Black and Hispanic students attend schools with these characteristics.

"Students in schools with above-average percentages of low income students, below-average teacher retention rates, and below-average student attendance have a higher likelihood of being identified as at significant risk."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id intersectional-risk-likelihood
title The likelihood of being identified as at risk increases as historically underserved background characteristics intersect, with variation by gender and race/ethnicity, and school characteristics also matter
description The likelihood of being identified as at risk increases as historically underserved background characteristics intersect, with variation by gender and race/ethnicity, and school characteristics also matter
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
source_checked 2026-10-20
recheck_by 2027
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — mariann-lemke-2024, mariann-lemke-2024-2, mariann-lemke-2024-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.