The intervention produced significant effects on researcher-developed measures of vocabulary depth but not vocabulary breadth¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Significant effects were detected on researcher-developed measures of vocabulary depth. → Proctor 2011
q2 i? No significant effect was detected on a researcher-developed measure of vocabulary breadth. → Proctor 2011 (2)
Evidence¶
Proctor 2011¶
Proctor, C.P., Dalton, B., Uccelli, P., Biancarosa, G., Mo, E., Snow, C., & Neugebauer, S. (2011). Improving comprehension online: effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual and monolingual fifth graders. Read Writ 24, 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9218-2
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Researcher-developed outcome measures administered in the same 16-week quasi-experiment with 240 students. The article reports "significant effects on researcher-developed measures of vocabulary depth"; no effect size is printed.
"Similarly, significant effects on researcher-developed measures of vocabulary depth were detected, but not for a researcher-developed measure of breadth."
Proctor 2011 (2)¶
Proctor, C.P., Dalton, B., Uccelli, P., Biancarosa, G., Mo, E., Snow, C., & Neugebauer, S. (2011). Improving comprehension online: effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual and monolingual fifth graders. Read Writ 24, 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9218-2
q2 · i? · causal · r?
In the same quasi-experiment, the researcher-developed breadth measure showed no significant intervention effect; the article prints no effect size, so the null is reported without an equivalence claim.
"Similarly, significant effects on researcher-developed measures of vocabulary depth were detected, but not for a researcher-developed measure of breadth."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Vocabulary — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- A 16-week universally designed online depth-of-vocabulary intervention improved standardized vocabulary knowledge relative to a control group in fifth graders — related
- World of Words produced a statistically significant medium-to-large effect on a researcher-developed vocabulary inductive reasoning test (effect size 0.66) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
intervention-vocabulary-depth-significant-breadth-not |
title |
The intervention produced significant effects on researcher-developed measures of vocabulary depth but not vocabulary breadth |
description |
The intervention produced significant effects on researcher-developed measures of vocabulary depth but not vocabulary breadth |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — proctor-2011, proctor-2011-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.