Claims

Interviewed learners unanimously perceived improvement in their listening comprehension and valued podcasts as a supplementary tool

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Inductive thematic analysis of eight semi-structured interviews yielded the themes listening achievement, learning by listening, learner choice and flexibility, and podcasts as a useful supplementary tool. → Shiri 2015

Evidence

Shiri 2015

Saeed Shiri. (2015). The Application of Podcasting as a Motivational Strategy to Iranian EFL Learners of English: A View toward Listening Comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.3p.155

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative thematic analysis of individual semi-structured interviews with four high-scoring and four low-scoring learners, transcribed and analyzed inductively. Learners also valued podcasts for home practice; perceptions are self-reported, not tested.

"The students unanimously perceived improvement in their listening comprehension ability. They believed they were able to learn a lot of new vocabulary and they have now sharper ears for spoken language."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.