ISIA students gained significantly more confidence in their learning than conventional-instruction peers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Students taught with the ISIA scored significantly higher on the confidence survey at post-test, with an eta-squared effect size of 0.12. → Fan et al. 2018
Evidence¶
Fan et al. 2018¶
Xinxin Fan, David Geelan and Robyn Gillies. (2018). Evaluating a Novel Instructional Sequence for Conceptual Change in Physics Using Interactive Simulations. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010029
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
One-way ANOVA on the five-point confidence rank survey appended to the conceptual test at post-test; the experimental group mean (M = 75.65, SD = 8.88) exceeded the control mean (M = 67.60, SD = 12.57).
"There was a statistically significant difference at the p < 0.05 level in scores for the two groups: F (1, 115) = 15.65, p = 0.000. The effect size, calculated using eta squared, was 0.12."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- ISIA students gained significantly more conceptual understanding of forces and motion than conventional-instruction peers — related
- ISIA students developed significantly greater inquiry process skills than conventional-instruction peers — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.