Regular ISS over longer periods was reported for complex practices and patient outcomes, while one to three sessions were reported effective for more easily defined or isolated tasks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Studies targeting complex practices and clinical outcomes (e.g. mock codes monthly for 48 months, 16 sessions over 18 months) implemented regular ISS over longer periods, whereas studies of isolated tasks reported one to three sessions as effective. → Evans Kerry 2022
Evidence¶
Evans Kerry 2022¶
Evans Kerry, Woodruff Jenny, Cowley Alison, Bramley Louise, Miles Giulia, Ross Alastair, Cooper Joanne, Baxendale Bryn. (2022). GENESISS 2—Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a systematic mapping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03401-y
q2 · i? · review · r3
Review category 3: seventeen studies aimed at improving clinical skills, performance and clinical management; ISS frequency varied from single sessions to repeat training lasting 18 months, with session length 30 min to 3 h. The review reports that studies with "more complex practices and clinical outcomes implemented regular ISS interventions over longer time periods".
"Some studies which involved more complex practices and clinical outcomes implemented regular ISS interventions over longer time periods."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In-situ simulation is used in healthcare for four mapped purposes: assessment, system readiness and safety culture, clinical skills and patient outcomes, and non-technical skills, knowledge and confidence — related
- Sustained interventions with regular reinforcement show more substantial improvements than short-term CPD programs — a broader claim this one bears on
- Clearest LLM-teaching signals appear in settings with clearly defined tasks, immediate feedback, and repeated practice, such as simulated patients and structured feedback — related
- Significant improvements in confidence, performance, management, communication, anxiety and knowledge scores were reported following ISS, but four controlled comparisons found no significant difference versus control or comparison training — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.