Claims

All nine studies using ISS to assess and promote system readiness and safety cultures reported improvements in readiness scores and safety attitudes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Nine observational studies using ISS to prepare staff for new facilities and promote safety cultures all reported improvements in readiness scores and safety attitudes outcomes. → Evans Kerry 2022

Evidence

Evans Kerry 2022

Evans Kerry, Woodruff Jenny, Cowley Alison, Bramley Louise, Miles Giulia, Ross Alastair, Cooper Joanne, Baxendale Bryn. (2022). GENESISS 2—Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a systematic mapping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03401-y

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review category 2: nine observational studies (samples where reported 14 to 289 participants) in EDs, operating theatres, a neonatal ICU and an obstetric unit, with data mainly from pre/post self-assessment questionnaires and direct observation. The review reports "All of the studies reported improvements in readiness scores and safety attitudes outcomes".

"All of the studies reported improvements in readiness scores and safety attitudes outcomes."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.