Item-level analysis attributes the experimental group's gains specifically to the target polyrhythmic structures (3:2, 4:3, 8:3, 5:4, 3:5)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Graphics of item-level scores show both groups scored near zero on target polyrhythm items at pre-test, and only the experimental group improved on them at post-test. → Hamit Yokus 2015

Evidence¶

Hamit Yokus 2015¶

Hamit Yokus, Tuba Yokus. (2015). Polyrhythmic Tapping: Examining the Effectiveness of the Strategy of Organizing Rhythmic Structures through Synthesis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.1917

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive item-level analysis of Graphics 1-8 covering all four sub-dimensions. The 3:2 items were near zero for both groups at pre-test; at post-test the experimental group neared the maximum while control scores stayed near zero on the target items.

"An analysis of Graphic 2 indicates that the experimental group reached the highest level (or came close to this level) on the first sub-dimension of the polyrhythmic tapping test. The control group has very low average scores or zero on items 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17 and 18, as they had on the pre-test."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Teaching the strategy of organizing rhythmic structures through synthesis produces significantly higher polyrhythmic tapping post-test scores than traditional training — a broader claim this one bears on
• The experimental group improved significantly from pre-test to post-test after learning the synthesis strategy — a broader claim this one bears on