ITS program completers earned an average final course grade of 2.18 on a 4.0 scale (SD = 1.388, N = 39)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Participants who completed the ITS program averaged 2.18 (SD = 1.388) on a 4.0 grade scale. → Copus 2016
Evidence¶
Copus 2016¶
Copus, C., & McKinney, B. (2016). Early Integration of Tutorial Support in Beginning Algebra. Journal of Developmental Education, 40(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152251
q2 · i? · design · r2
Descriptive grade outcome for the 39 students who completed the ITS program across the four-semester study; the article reports the mean and standard deviation but no comparison test for this statistic.
"To date, the data show an average course grade for participants who completed the program of 2.18 on a 4.0 scale (M = 2.18, SD = 1.388, N = 39)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Women assigned to the chatbot in Microeconomics earned final grades seven points higher than control women, with no treatment effects for men — related
- Compared with non-ePortfolio peers, students in courses requiring ePortfolios were generally more engaged, earned higher grades, and were more likely to complete and persist, per the 26-institution project evidence — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.