ITS effectiveness is not moderated by whether the ITS provides feedback or models student misconceptions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q4
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i? Effect sizes were not moderated by whether the ITS provided feedback or modeled misconceptions; use of ITS produced moderate, statistically significant effect sizes in both cases. → Wenting Ma 2014
Evidence¶
Wenting Ma 2014¶
Wenting Ma, Olusola O. Adesope, John C. Nesbit, and Qing Liu. (2014). Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037123
q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
ITS-characteristics moderator analysis (Table 2). Under both fixed- and random-effects models, use of ITS produced statistically significant effect sizes whether or not it provided feedback (no feedback k = 10; feedback k = 86) and whether or not it modeled misconceptions (no k = 21; yes k = 58); the between-levels difference for misconception modeling was not statistically significant under either model.
"U n d er b o th th e fix ed and ran d o m -effects m od els, overlap in co nfid ence in terv als in d icates th at effe ct sizes w ere not m o d erated by w heth er or n o t th e IT S p rovided fe edback."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- MisconceptionTutor achieves higher pedagogical quality (DAMR) than BaselineTutor on nearly all dimensions, with small-to-moderate effect sizes — related
- Pedagogically desired feedback is engaged with more (higher RelScore), but pedagogical quality shows little relation to whether actions are applied correctly (SuccScore) — related
- Six of thirteen coded moderators significantly influence the effect of CALL feedback: educational level, intervention provider, mother tongue, research context, subject domain, and target language — related
- Feedback in CALL has a significant moderate positive effect on student language learning outcomes (RE g = 0.56) across 21 studies — related
- ITS produce significant positive effects at all grade levels and in almost all subject domains evaluated, with exceptions such as chemistry — related
- Providing corrective feedback on practice tests does not significantly change the testing effect (g = 0.63 with feedback vs. g = 0.60 without) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
its-effect-not-moderated-by-feedback-or-misconception-modeling |
title |
ITS effectiveness is not moderated by whether the ITS provides feedback or models student misconceptions |
description |
ITS effectiveness is not moderated by whether the ITS provides feedback or models student misconceptions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wenting-ma-2014 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.