Weekly laboratory skills ratings of the jigsaw group exceeded the scale midpoint across all experiment stages¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Average LSES scores for pre-preparation, preparing the set-up, making the experiment, and reporting were above 3 on the 5-point checklist across the six experiments. → Abdullah Aydin 2017

Evidence¶

Abdullah Aydin 2017¶

Abdullah Aydin, Filiz Biyikli. (2017). The Effect of Jigsaw Technique on the Students' Laboratory Material Recognition and Usage Skills in General Physics Laboratory-I Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(7). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050701

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive checklist (LSES) applied weekly only to the jigsaw group as a mid-test, rated 1-5 across four skill headings and six experiments. The authors interpret that "the collaborative jigsaw method contributed positively to the process of making the experiment."

"it is seen that the students' average scores in the main skills of pre-preparation, preparing the experiment set -up, making the experiment, reporting the experiment and also the subskills related to them are over the average score (3). It points out that the collaborative jigsaw method contributed positively to the process of making the experiment."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Jigsaw cooperative learning produced higher laboratory material recognition post-test scores than traditional instruction in General Physics Laboratory-I — related
• Jigsaw cooperative learning produced higher laboratory material usage post-test scores than traditional instruction — related
• The jigsaw and control groups did not differ on material recognition or usage pre-tests — related