Joint attention between teachers and pupils depends on situational differences and teachers' agency and communion¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Haataja et al. found that joint attention between teachers and their pupils during actual classroom teaching depends on situational differences as well as on teachers' agency and communion. → Jarodzka 2020

Evidence¶

Jarodzka 2020¶

Jarodzka, H., Skuballa, I., & Gruber, H. (2020). Eye-Tracking in Educational Practice: Investigating Visual Perception Underlying Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09565-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Haataja, Salonen, Laine, Toivanen, and Hannula's case study, described as the first publication on joint eye-tracking of pupils and teachers within authentic lessons, using multiple mobile eye-tracking glasses, specially developed analysis software, and classroom video coding. The review attributes the finding to the authors.

"The authors found that the joint attention between teachers and their pupils depends on situational differences, as well as on teachers'agency and communion (cf. Gurtman 2009)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Teachers and students use gaze to express agency and communion during classroom problem-solving — related
• Experienced and student teachers establish joint attention with pupils at different moments during instruction — related