Judgment-of-learning accuracy after video modeling examples does not differ by model or observer gender, and students of both genders predict their performance accurately¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? No main effects of Gender Model or Gender Observer, and no interaction, on judgment of learning scores or their accuracy; accuracy did not differ from zero in any condition. → Vincent Hoogerheide 2016

Evidence¶

Vincent Hoogerheide 2016¶

Vincent Hoogerheide, Sofie M. M. Loyens, Tamara van Gog. (2016). Learning from video modeling examples: does gender matter? Instructional Science, 44, 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9360-y

q3 · i? · causal · r2

2x2 ANOVA on judgment of learning and its accuracy in the 2x2 experiment: no significant gender main effects or interaction, and one-sample t-tests showed accuracy "not statistically different from zero" in all four conditions. Equivalence across genders was not tested.

"One sample t-tests showed that for all four combinations of the 2 9 2 design, judgment of learning accuracy was not statistically different from zero, ts [ .10, indicating that male and female students were highly accurate in predicting their performance."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Model gender and observer gender do not affect learning outcomes or near transfer from video modeling examples — related
• Male secondary students report higher self-efficacy than female students after learning from video modeling examples, without higher performance — related
• Model-observer gender combination affects mental effort invested during example study: male students invest less effort with a male model, female students more effort with a male model — related