Claims

Journal entry practice enhancement activities outperform general vocabulary exercises for learning ESP technical vocabulary

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group B (mean 153.1) outperformed the control group A (mean 139.5) on the post-test of 50 accounting vocabulary items. → Xu 2018

Evidence

Xu 2018

Liju Xu. (2018). Learning and Retaining Technical Vocabulary with Enhancement Activities in an ESP Course. English Language Teaching, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n10p145

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 200 accounting juniors randomly assigned to two groups of 100 after proficiency homogenization; the article reports the post-test means in Table 1, where "the experimental group B (with mean score 153.1) outperformed the control group A (with mean score 139.5)". No effect size or significance test for the between-group contrast is printed.

"However, the experimental group B (with mean score 153.1) outperformed the control group A (with mean score 139.5)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.