Journal writing with weekly teacher feedback fostered cooperative learning atmosphere and student-teacher rapport¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? By the seventh week a cooperative learning atmosphere pervaded the experimental group, with students discussing journal entries and forming voluntary peer-editing groups. → Tuan 2010
q1 i? Student-teacher rapport was strengthened through the researcher's weekly comments and responses on journal entries, per student reflections. → Tuan 2010 (2)
Evidence¶
Tuan 2010¶
Luu Trong Tuan. (2010). Enhancing EFL Learners’ Writing Skill via Journal Writing. English Language Teaching, Vol. 3, No. 3. www.ccsenet.org/elt. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081806
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Qualitative observations of journal entries and occasional interviews with experimental-group students; students also formed informal peer-editing groups and published entries on class and individual blogs.
"By the seventh week, a cooperative learning atmosphere pervaded the experimental group. Often overheard in the conversations at break time or after class were such utterances as “ Have you written your journal entry today?”"
Tuan 2010 (2)¶
Luu Trong Tuan. (2010). Enhancing EFL Learners’ Writing Skill via Journal Writing. English Language Teaching, Vol. 3, No. 3. www.ccsenet.org/elt. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081806
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Authors' interpretation of observational and interview data; one student wrote that the teacher corrected journal entries every week while the writing teacher had corrected only three essays during the semester.
"Not only was the cooperative learning atmosphere among the students created thanks to journal writing, but the student-teacher rapport was also strengthened through the researcher’s comments on and responses to their writings."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Collaboration — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Four relational components—positive feedback, rapport, mutual respect, and reciprocal trust—form the relational framework of coaching — related
- The effect of social persuasion on student teacher efficacy depends on its form: verbal feedback from cooperating teachers is positive while structured communication tools and peer pairing show no benefit — related
- Interviewed students valued idea generation and peer evaluation but reported difficulties with editing checklists and unhelpful peer feedback — related
- A nine-week cross-age peer mentoring program did not produce statistically significant increases in global school connectedness among rural middle school mentees, though mean scores rose in both groups — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.