Claims

Journal writing was associated with a significant positive change in experimental students' attitudes toward science, while control students' attitudes did not change

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's pre-test to post-test attitude scores improved significantly (z=3.291, p<.05). → Pınar 2020 q2 i? The control group showed no significant pre-test to post-test attitude change (z=-.201, p>.05). → Pınar 2020 (2)

Evidence

Pınar 2020

Pınar, E. & Yıldız, A. (2020). The Effect of Journal Writing, One of the “Writing to Learn” Activities, on Achievement and Science Attitude in the Fourth Grade Science Course. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 10(1), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.26579/jocress.354

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Wilcoxon signed rank test comparing the experimental group's (n=24) pre- and post-test scores on the Attitude Scale towards Science Course after five weeks of journal writing; the article reports a significant difference in favour of post-test (z=3.291, p<.05).

"It can be stated that journal writing as a WTL activity affected experimental group students’ attitudes towards the science course positively (z=3.291, p<.05)."

Pınar 2020 (2)

Pınar, E. & Yıldız, A. (2020). The Effect of Journal Writing, One of the “Writing to Learn” Activities, on Achievement and Science Attitude in the Fourth Grade Science Course. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 10(1), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.26579/jocress.354

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Wilcoxon signed rank test comparing the control group's (n=20) pre- and post-test attitude scores; the article reports no significant difference (z=-.201; p>.05).

"It is revealed that the control group’s pre -test and post -test scores’ mean ranks are in favour of positive ranks and considering the sum of ranks, they are in f avour of negative ranks (z=-.201; p>.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.